<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1517 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the exclusion of specific companies from the final list of comparables due to functional dissimilarities and exceptional performance. This exclusion resulted in the assessee&#039;s margin falling within an acceptable range, leading to the acceptance of the transfer pricing methodology. The order was pronounced on 24th April 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1517 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the exclusion of specific companies from the final list of comparables due to functional dissimilarities and exceptional performance. This exclusion resulted in the assessee&#039;s margin falling within an acceptable range, leading to the acceptance of the transfer pricing methodology. The order was pronounced on 24th April 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>