<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1506 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging various additions made by the Assessing Officer, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decisions. The Tribunal emphasized that the same income cannot be taxed in two assessment years to avoid double taxation and noted the consistency in tax treatment across years. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication on the disallowance of professional fees, restoring the issue to the AO for verification with the concerned party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1506 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging various additions made by the Assessing Officer, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decisions. The Tribunal emphasized that the same income cannot be taxed in two assessment years to avoid double taxation and noted the consistency in tax treatment across years. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication on the disallowance of professional fees, restoring the issue to the AO for verification with the concerned party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>