<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1435 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280261</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision in a case involving revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The Court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach in estimating business income at 8% of gross receipts to be justified, considering the Assessee&#039;s inability to produce relevant documents. It was determined that the AO&#039;s actions were reasonable, and the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1435 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280261</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision in a case involving revision under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The Court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach in estimating business income at 8% of gross receipts to be justified, considering the Assessee&#039;s inability to produce relevant documents. It was determined that the AO&#039;s actions were reasonable, and the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>