https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280260 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an effective statutory remedy is available, unless the challenge involves a statutory invalidity, breach of natural justice, or lack of jurisdiction. In this Kerala HC decision, a penalty challenge under the KVAT regime was declined because the dispute over alleged misclassification of goods involved a mixed question of fact and law that should be examined by the statutory fact-finding authorities. The Court therefore treated the availability of the revisional remedy as decisive and left the classification and penalty issues to be pursued on merits through the statutory forum. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Apr 2019 06:36:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280260 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an effective statutory remedy is available, unless the challenge involves a statutory invalidity, breach of natural justice, or lack of jurisdiction. In this Kerala HC decision, a penalty challenge under the KVAT regime was declined because the dispute over alleged misclassification of goods involved a mixed question of fact and law that should be examined by the statutory fact-finding authorities. The Court therefore treated the availability of the revisional remedy as decisive and left the classification and penalty issues to be pursued on merits through the statutory forum. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280260