<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 43 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17853</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the claim for loss of stock-in-trade by the assessee. It was determined that the stock could not be considered lost until the criminal case regarding the seized sal seeds was resolved. The court emphasized that the status of the stock as a loss depended on the outcome of the criminal proceedings, and until a decision was made regarding the confiscated stock, it could not be treated as a deductible loss. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue was deemed appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 43 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17853</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the claim for loss of stock-in-trade by the assessee. It was determined that the stock could not be considered lost until the criminal case regarding the seized sal seeds was resolved. The court emphasized that the status of the stock as a loss depended on the outcome of the criminal proceedings, and until a decision was made regarding the confiscated stock, it could not be treated as a deductible loss. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue was deemed appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>