<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 655 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280247</link>
    <description>Compliance with NDPS search safeguards remains critical: notice informing the accused of the option to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer was treated as substantially compliant because no rigid form is prescribed, but the failure to associate independent and respectable local witnesses, and the absence of effective written process to persons present at the spot, rendered the recovery doubtful on the stated facts. The note emphasises that where mandatory search and seizure safeguards under the NDPS framework and the incorporated CrPC procedure are not properly observed, the conviction cannot be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 655 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280247</link>
      <description>Compliance with NDPS search safeguards remains critical: notice informing the accused of the option to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer was treated as substantially compliant because no rigid form is prescribed, but the failure to associate independent and respectable local witnesses, and the absence of effective written process to persons present at the spot, rendered the recovery doubtful on the stated facts. The note emphasises that where mandatory search and seizure safeguards under the NDPS framework and the incorporated CrPC procedure are not properly observed, the conviction cannot be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>