https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280243 Leave to appeal against acquittal was declined because the prosecution evidence was found materially infirm. The case depended entirely on police witnesses, with no independent or respectable local witnesses joined in the raid or house search despite their availability, and the claimed efforts for public participation were treated as insincere. The Court also noted contradictions about the timing and movement of the rukka and FIR, unexplained use of private vehicles, doubts over the alleged master copies and printing of counterfeit notes, and discrepancies suggesting possible tampering with seized currency and case property. In an appeal against acquittal, interference is limited to exceptional cases of perversity, and the reinforced presumption of innocence was held to bar intervention. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:43:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280243 Leave to appeal against acquittal was declined because the prosecution evidence was found materially infirm. The case depended entirely on police witnesses, with no independent or respectable local witnesses joined in the raid or house search despite their availability, and the claimed efforts for public participation were treated as insincere. The Court also noted contradictions about the timing and movement of the rukka and FIR, unexplained use of private vehicles, doubts over the alleged master copies and printing of counterfeit notes, and discrepancies suggesting possible tampering with seized currency and case property. In an appeal against acquittal, interference is limited to exceptional cases of perversity, and the reinforced presumption of innocence was held to bar intervention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280243