<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1495 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379051</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitioner to manually file the GSTR-3B form due to design limitations. Verification of credits in local areas was directed, along with approval of interest liability and set-off of credit towards a notional demand. The court instructed against further demands by respondents and ordered the refund of late fee paid by the petitioner. The case was resolved in favor of the petitioner, ensuring compliance with legal requirements and fairness in the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1495 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379051</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitioner to manually file the GSTR-3B form due to design limitations. Verification of credits in local areas was directed, along with approval of interest liability and set-off of credit towards a notional demand. The court instructed against further demands by respondents and ordered the refund of late fee paid by the petitioner. The case was resolved in favor of the petitioner, ensuring compliance with legal requirements and fairness in the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>