<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1492 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379048</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the classification of income from the lease of a hotel as Business Income instead of House Property Income. The Court also affirmed the application of the Arms&#039; Length Principle for determining fair market value for tax purposes. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Court found no substantial legal questions arising from the issues raised, and the arguments presented were not deemed to introduce new facets to the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1492 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379048</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the classification of income from the lease of a hotel as Business Income instead of House Property Income. The Court also affirmed the application of the Arms&#039; Length Principle for determining fair market value for tax purposes. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Court found no substantial legal questions arising from the issues raised, and the arguments presented were not deemed to introduce new facets to the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>