https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379032 The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the AO for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. It upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of the Arm's Length Price of international transactions. The Tribunal supported the acceptance of internal Transactional Net Margin Method benchmarking and segmentation by the assessee, finding no factual or legal issues with the CIT(A)'s orders. The Tribunal also agreed with the application of OECD guidelines and rejected the comparables selected by the Transfer Pricing Officer. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379032 The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals filed by the AO for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. It upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of the Arm's Length Price of international transactions. The Tribunal supported the acceptance of internal Transactional Net Margin Method benchmarking and segmentation by the assessee, finding no factual or legal issues with the CIT(A)'s orders. The Tribunal also agreed with the application of OECD guidelines and rejected the comparables selected by the Transfer Pricing Officer. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379032