<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 107 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17844</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, a public limited company, in a case concerning the deduction allowed for entertainment expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the expenditure on providing tea, coffee, etc., to customers, staff, and technicians did not qualify as entertainment expenditure following an amendment broadening the definition to include hospitality expenses. As the expenditure was not segregated between customers and employees, it was not considered entertainment expenditure, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 107 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17844</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, a public limited company, in a case concerning the deduction allowed for entertainment expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the expenditure on providing tea, coffee, etc., to customers, staff, and technicians did not qualify as entertainment expenditure following an amendment broadening the definition to include hospitality expenses. As the expenditure was not segregated between customers and employees, it was not considered entertainment expenditure, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>