https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379022 The High Court of Calcutta ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute involving the valuation of imported goods below a specified threshold. The Court upheld the argument that a notification by the Department of Commerce specified conditions for duty-free importation based on value, leading to confiscation proceedings for goods valued below the threshold. While acknowledging the appellant's good faith, the Court emphasized its lack of jurisdiction in valuation disputes and suggested seeking redress in a more appropriate forum. The judgment underscored the significance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries in legal matters, especially concerning importation valuation disputes. en-us Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379022 The High Court of Calcutta ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute involving the valuation of imported goods below a specified threshold. The Court upheld the argument that a notification by the Department of Commerce specified conditions for duty-free importation based on value, leading to confiscation proceedings for goods valued below the threshold. While acknowledging the appellant's good faith, the Court emphasized its lack of jurisdiction in valuation disputes and suggested seeking redress in a more appropriate forum. The judgment underscored the significance of respecting jurisdictional boundaries in legal matters, especially concerning importation valuation disputes. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379022