<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1352 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280233</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amended provision extending the time limit for deeming a person to be in default for failure to deduct tax from a resident in India cannot be applied retrospectively. Relying on the decision in Tata Teleservices case, the Court allowed the petitions, quashed the notices dated 15.9.2015, and disposed of the petitions accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1352 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280233</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amended provision extending the time limit for deeming a person to be in default for failure to deduct tax from a resident in India cannot be applied retrospectively. Relying on the decision in Tata Teleservices case, the Court allowed the petitions, quashed the notices dated 15.9.2015, and disposed of the petitions accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>