https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280231 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for Service Tax under "Business Auxiliary Service" for commissions received by a manufacturing company from mutual fund distributors. The appellant's argument that services were provided under the Reverse Charge Mechanism, coupled with evidence of tax deduction at source by distributors, led the Tribunal to rule against double taxation, ultimately allowing the appeal and relieving the appellant of the tax liability. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280231 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for Service Tax under "Business Auxiliary Service" for commissions received by a manufacturing company from mutual fund distributors. The appellant's argument that services were provided under the Reverse Charge Mechanism, coupled with evidence of tax deduction at source by distributors, led the Tribunal to rule against double taxation, ultimately allowing the appeal and relieving the appellant of the tax liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280231