<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1952 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280235</link>
    <description>The court found the petitioner&#039;s revision of credits under the GST regime impermissible, leading to a demand of Rs. 16.80 crores not based on tax liability. The court directed the GST Council and other respondents to address discrepancies and required the petitioner to submit amended returns. Interim orders were to remain in force until the next hearing. The judgment emphasized the need for a detailed response from the respondents before making a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1952 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280235</link>
      <description>The court found the petitioner&#039;s revision of credits under the GST regime impermissible, leading to a demand of Rs. 16.80 crores not based on tax liability. The court directed the GST Council and other respondents to address discrepancies and required the petitioner to submit amended returns. Interim orders were to remain in force until the next hearing. The judgment emphasized the need for a detailed response from the respondents before making a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>