<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1610 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280239</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT to treat receipts from a hotel lease as business income. The Court emphasized the historical treatment of income and the terms of the lease agreement, noting the absence of fixed rent. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, as the classification of income as business income was consistent for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1610 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280239</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT to treat receipts from a hotel lease as business income. The Court emphasized the historical treatment of income and the terms of the lease agreement, noting the absence of fixed rent. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, as the classification of income as business income was consistent for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>