<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1556 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280212</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenging section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act and raising a limitation plea under section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were dismissed. The HC applied the ratio of its earlier judgment, indicating that the same legal position governed both the statutory challenge and the limitation objection. The dismissal left the earlier interpretation of section 174 and the limitation bar under section 25(1) undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1556 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280212</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenging section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act and raising a limitation plea under section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were dismissed. The HC applied the ratio of its earlier judgment, indicating that the same legal position governed both the statutory challenge and the limitation objection. The dismissal left the earlier interpretation of section 174 and the limitation bar under section 25(1) undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>