<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1426 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378982</link>
    <description>Receipts from leasing transponders or bandwidth for satellite transmission services were held not taxable in India as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. The tribunal followed earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case and the jurisdictional High Court, holding that satellite transmission receipts did not constitute royalty on the binding treaty interpretation. It further held that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) could not be used to enlarge the scope of taxation under the DTAA, and with no change in the material facts, the consistent earlier view was applied in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1426 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378982</link>
      <description>Receipts from leasing transponders or bandwidth for satellite transmission services were held not taxable in India as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. The tribunal followed earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case and the jurisdictional High Court, holding that satellite transmission receipts did not constitute royalty on the binding treaty interpretation. It further held that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) could not be used to enlarge the scope of taxation under the DTAA, and with no change in the material facts, the consistent earlier view was applied in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>