<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 49 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17830</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the employees, stating that the expenses met by the employer for boarding and lodging were exempt under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the amounts did not constitute perquisites and were rightfully excluded from the total income of the employees. The judgment favored the employees, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s claim, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:16:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 49 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17830</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the employees, stating that the expenses met by the employer for boarding and lodging were exempt under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the amounts did not constitute perquisites and were rightfully excluded from the total income of the employees. The judgment favored the employees, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s claim, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>