<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1407 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter for re-calculation of the demand after adjusting excess duty paid by BSNL towards short paid duty. The Tribunal held that valuation of goods should be based on the Challaning Rate of the current year, allowing for adjustments. The imposition of penalties on BSNL was set aside, and any remaining differential duty was to be recovered from BSNL.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 06:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1407 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter for re-calculation of the demand after adjusting excess duty paid by BSNL towards short paid duty. The Tribunal held that valuation of goods should be based on the Challaning Rate of the current year, allowing for adjustments. The imposition of penalties on BSNL was set aside, and any remaining differential duty was to be recovered from BSNL.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>