<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST ON POLYPROPYLENE LENO BAGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8476</link>
    <description>The AAAR held that polypropylene leno bags woven from polypropylene strips are classifiable under the chapter for plastic goods rather than textile headings, relying on precedent treating sacks woven from plastic tapes as plastic goods and on the manufacturer&#039;s prior tariff declaration and duty-drawback practice; applying equitable estoppel, the AAAR disallowed the company&#039;s attempt to adopt a divergent classification without amendment or cogent explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 06:17:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 06:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST ON POLYPROPYLENE LENO BAGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8476</link>
      <description>The AAAR held that polypropylene leno bags woven from polypropylene strips are classifiable under the chapter for plastic goods rather than textile headings, relying on precedent treating sacks woven from plastic tapes as plastic goods and on the manufacturer&#039;s prior tariff declaration and duty-drawback practice; applying equitable estoppel, the AAAR disallowed the company&#039;s attempt to adopt a divergent classification without amendment or cogent explanation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 06:17:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>