https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280193 Promotion to LDC was held unsustainable where the petitioners lacked the requisite recognised qualification at the time of promotion. Prathma had ceased to be recognised by the State Government from 1 April 1985, and the larger bench ruling treating Prathma as equivalent to Secondary applied only to vacancies arising before that date. As the petitioners were promoted for 1995-96, the exception did not apply, and the challenge to the reversion order failed. en-us Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:53:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280193 Promotion to LDC was held unsustainable where the petitioners lacked the requisite recognised qualification at the time of promotion. Prathma had ceased to be recognised by the State Government from 1 April 1985, and the larger bench ruling treating Prathma as equivalent to Secondary applied only to vacancies arising before that date. As the petitioners were promoted for 1995-96, the exception did not apply, and the challenge to the reversion order failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280193