<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1004 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280188</link>
    <description>The court upheld the priority claim of the Employees&#039; Provident Fund Organisation for unpaid contributions in companies in liquidation, equating it with workers&#039; claims under Section 529(A) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Official Liquidator was directed to comply with specific directions within a timeframe, which was confirmed. Despite a request for contempt proceedings, the court rejected it, stating it was separate from the pending appeals. The appeals were summarily dismissed as they were deemed not meritorious in the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1004 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280188</link>
      <description>The court upheld the priority claim of the Employees&#039; Provident Fund Organisation for unpaid contributions in companies in liquidation, equating it with workers&#039; claims under Section 529(A) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Official Liquidator was directed to comply with specific directions within a timeframe, which was confirmed. Despite a request for contempt proceedings, the court rejected it, stating it was separate from the pending appeals. The appeals were summarily dismissed as they were deemed not meritorious in the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>