<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1367 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, disallowing the assessee&#039;s section 80IC deduction claim for pan masala manufacturing due to its inclusion in the negative list and failure to meet the manufacturing criteria. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction claim for wristwatches as part of the assessee&#039;s brought forward stock. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, reinstating the disallowance of the section 80IC deduction for pan masala manufacturing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:12:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1367 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, disallowing the assessee&#039;s section 80IC deduction claim for pan masala manufacturing due to its inclusion in the negative list and failure to meet the manufacturing criteria. However, the Tribunal allowed the deduction claim for wristwatches as part of the assessee&#039;s brought forward stock. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, reinstating the disallowance of the section 80IC deduction for pan masala manufacturing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>