<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1365 - ITAT AMRITSAR (Jalandhar bench)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 46,50,000/- made by the AO, and held that being a Power of Attorney (PoA) holder did not make the assessee liable for tax on the stamp duty value of the property. The assessment order under sections 143(3)/147 was deemed invalid due to non-compliance with mandatory conditions under section 147. The decision emphasized that a PoA does not equate to ownership and cannot be taxed as such.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1365 - ITAT AMRITSAR (Jalandhar bench)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 46,50,000/- made by the AO, and held that being a Power of Attorney (PoA) holder did not make the assessee liable for tax on the stamp duty value of the property. The assessment order under sections 143(3)/147 was deemed invalid due to non-compliance with mandatory conditions under section 147. The decision emphasized that a PoA does not equate to ownership and cannot be taxed as such.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>