<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer Challenges Service Tax Recovery; Claims Payments Not Covered Under VCES, Avoids Defaulter Status for Deposits.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46086</link>
    <description>Recovery of service tax dues of the assessee from the bank a/c - dafaulter - VCES application was on grounds that two of the deposits made by the petitioner towards his arrears of tax dues was not covered under the Scheme - it was nevertheless a tax deposit and to that extent the petitioner could not be held a defaulter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:10:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 21:45:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer Challenges Service Tax Recovery; Claims Payments Not Covered Under VCES, Avoids Defaulter Status for Deposits.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46086</link>
      <description>Recovery of service tax dues of the assessee from the bank a/c - dafaulter - VCES application was on grounds that two of the deposits made by the petitioner towards his arrears of tax dues was not covered under the Scheme - it was nevertheless a tax deposit and to that extent the petitioner could not be held a defaulter.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:10:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>