<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1353 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378909</link>
    <description>Under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013, the relevant reference date for &quot;tax dues&quot; was 1 March 2013, and payments made after that date but before the Scheme&#039;s formal incorporation on 10 May 2013 could not be excluded absent an express bar. The Patna HC held that deposits made in that interregnum remained payments toward service tax arrears, so rejection of the declaration on that ground was unsustainable and was set aside. For the same reason, recovery under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not proceed as if no payment had been made; the recovery notice was quashed and the recovered amount was directed to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1353 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378909</link>
      <description>Under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013, the relevant reference date for &quot;tax dues&quot; was 1 March 2013, and payments made after that date but before the Scheme&#039;s formal incorporation on 10 May 2013 could not be excluded absent an express bar. The Patna HC held that deposits made in that interregnum remained payments toward service tax arrears, so rejection of the declaration on that ground was unsustainable and was set aside. For the same reason, recovery under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not proceed as if no payment had been made; the recovery notice was quashed and the recovered amount was directed to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>