<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1339 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in the second round of litigation, emphasizing the need to conclude proceedings. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, highlighting the importance of closure in the legal process based on legal precedents and the maxim of public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1339 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in the second round of litigation, emphasizing the need to conclude proceedings. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, highlighting the importance of closure in the legal process based on legal precedents and the maxim of public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>