<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1337 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378893</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, allowing the use of accumulated Cenvat Credit for duty payment during a default period. The Tribunal also dismissed the disallowance of cenvat credit, interest, and penalties under Rule 25, aligning with decisions from various High Courts. The appeal was denied, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:09:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1337 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378893</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, allowing the use of accumulated Cenvat Credit for duty payment during a default period. The Tribunal also dismissed the disallowance of cenvat credit, interest, and penalties under Rule 25, aligning with decisions from various High Courts. The appeal was denied, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>