<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1331 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378887</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 33/2005-CE was confined to goods covered by the prescribed certificate, so only the certified quantity qualified for relief. Where the certificate covered 100 meters and 418 meters were cleared, the excess 318 meters fell outside the conditional exemption and attracted duty liability. The duty demand and penalty were therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1331 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378887</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 33/2005-CE was confined to goods covered by the prescribed certificate, so only the certified quantity qualified for relief. Where the certificate covered 100 meters and 418 meters were cleared, the excess 318 meters fell outside the conditional exemption and attracted duty liability. The duty demand and penalty were therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>