<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1879 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year if the machinery was used for less than 180 days in the year of installation. This decision aligns with the interpretations of various high courts and the clarificatory amendment effective from 01.04.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 21:26:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=568104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1879 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year if the machinery was used for less than 180 days in the year of installation. This decision aligns with the interpretations of various high courts and the clarificatory amendment effective from 01.04.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>