<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 15 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17808</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh considered the interpretation of &#039;assessed tax&#039; in the Income-tax Act, particularly in relation to penalty calculation under section 271(1)(i)(b). The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision that advance tax payable by an unregistered firm should determine the penalty amount, instead of the advance tax paid by a registered firm. The Court found the issues raised to be debatable and worthy of consideration, directing the reference of the questions raised by the Commissioner of Income-tax for further examination. Ultimately, the Court allowed the Commissioner&#039;s plea, emphasizing the importance of addressing the legal issues presented in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:23:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 15 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17808</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh considered the interpretation of &#039;assessed tax&#039; in the Income-tax Act, particularly in relation to penalty calculation under section 271(1)(i)(b). The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision that advance tax payable by an unregistered firm should determine the penalty amount, instead of the advance tax paid by a registered firm. The Court found the issues raised to be debatable and worthy of consideration, directing the reference of the questions raised by the Commissioner of Income-tax for further examination. Ultimately, the Court allowed the Commissioner&#039;s plea, emphasizing the importance of addressing the legal issues presented in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>