<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378851</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals by the assessee for statistical purposes as there was a violation of natural justice in the penalty orders under sections 271B, 271(1)(c), and 271F of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The orders of the Ld. CIT(A) were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity in accordance with the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378851</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals by the assessee for statistical purposes as there was a violation of natural justice in the penalty orders under sections 271B, 271(1)(c), and 271F of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The orders of the Ld. CIT(A) were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity in accordance with the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>