<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 38 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17798</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that mandi fee was not to be treated as a tax or duty under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, based on the understanding that mandi fee did not fall within the scope of taxes mentioned in section 43B, was upheld by the High Court, citing relevant case law. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the High Court directed the transmission of the order to the Tribunal without any order as to costs, with a fixed counsel fee for each side.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 38 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17798</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that mandi fee was not to be treated as a tax or duty under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, based on the understanding that mandi fee did not fall within the scope of taxes mentioned in section 43B, was upheld by the High Court, citing relevant case law. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the High Court directed the transmission of the order to the Tribunal without any order as to costs, with a fixed counsel fee for each side.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>