<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 61,56,80,326/- under Section 115JB was unwarranted as there was no revaluation of assets. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A was overturned because the Assessing Officer failed to establish satisfaction as required. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1283 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 61,56,80,326/- under Section 115JB was unwarranted as there was no revaluation of assets. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A was overturned because the Assessing Officer failed to establish satisfaction as required. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>