<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1253 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand to include sales tax incentives in the assessable value for excise duty, following Supreme Court interpretations. The demand was limited to the normal time limit, considering recent court decisions and circulars. No penalty was imposed on the respondent due to the lack of clarity on the issue until recent guidance. The Tribunal directed the re-quantification of the demand within the normal time limit, emphasizing no penalty should be levied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 06:42:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1253 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand to include sales tax incentives in the assessable value for excise duty, following Supreme Court interpretations. The demand was limited to the normal time limit, considering recent court decisions and circulars. No penalty was imposed on the respondent due to the lack of clarity on the issue until recent guidance. The Tribunal directed the re-quantification of the demand within the normal time limit, emphasizing no penalty should be levied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>