https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378808 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Assistant Commissioner's decision to disallow a portion of the refund claimed by the Appellant for unutilized CENVAT credit. The Tribunal found merit in the Appellant's arguments, supported by legal precedents, and concluded that the assessing officer lacked valid grounds for rejecting the refund claims. It determined that the Appellant was entitled to the refunds, deeming the disallowance unjustified. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Apr 2019 06:41:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378808 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Assistant Commissioner's decision to disallow a portion of the refund claimed by the Appellant for unutilized CENVAT credit. The Tribunal found merit in the Appellant's arguments, supported by legal precedents, and concluded that the assessing officer lacked valid grounds for rejecting the refund claims. It determined that the Appellant was entitled to the refunds, deeming the disallowance unjustified. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378808