<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1249 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378805</link>
    <description>The court allowed the revisions and set aside the Trade Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision upholding the penalty imposed on the applicant. The court found that the applicant&#039;s actions were based on a bona fide belief and not indicative of deliberate tax evasion. Despite discrepancies in the registration granted, the court concluded that there was no evidence of malice or intentional wrongdoing on the applicant&#039;s part, leading to the reversal of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1249 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378805</link>
      <description>The court allowed the revisions and set aside the Trade Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision upholding the penalty imposed on the applicant. The court found that the applicant&#039;s actions were based on a bona fide belief and not indicative of deliberate tax evasion. Despite discrepancies in the registration granted, the court concluded that there was no evidence of malice or intentional wrongdoing on the applicant&#039;s part, leading to the reversal of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>