<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 53 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17792</link>
    <description>Membership of a Hindu undivided family is determined by sapindaship and family relationship, not by ownership of property. A wife could not sever herself from the HUF by a unilateral declaration or release deed while the marital relationship continued, because severance of status or divesting of family rights requires a legally effective partition, settlement, or transfer recognised in law. A purported release intended to operate as a transfer of property rights also attracts the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act, and cannot function as an effective unilateral device to exclude a family member. The declaration was therefore ineffective for wealth-tax purposes, and the wife remained a member of the HUF.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:39:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 53 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17792</link>
      <description>Membership of a Hindu undivided family is determined by sapindaship and family relationship, not by ownership of property. A wife could not sever herself from the HUF by a unilateral declaration or release deed while the marital relationship continued, because severance of status or divesting of family rights requires a legally effective partition, settlement, or transfer recognised in law. A purported release intended to operate as a transfer of property rights also attracts the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act, and cannot function as an effective unilateral device to exclude a family member. The declaration was therefore ineffective for wealth-tax purposes, and the wife remained a member of the HUF.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>