<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Place of supply</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114909</link>
    <description>Place-of-supply under an ex-works delivery is disputed: whether the transaction is intra-state (CGST/SGST) because movement terminates in the supplier&#039;s state, or inter-state (IGST) because supplier and purchaser are in different states. Opinion splits on whether the purchaser must obtain casual taxpayer registration and charge IGST to its customer; an Authority for Advance Ruling is cited supporting the IGST view.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:10:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Place of supply</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114909</link>
      <description>Place-of-supply under an ex-works delivery is disputed: whether the transaction is intra-state (CGST/SGST) because movement terminates in the supplier&#039;s state, or inter-state (IGST) because supplier and purchaser are in different states. Opinion splits on whether the purchaser must obtain casual taxpayer registration and charge IGST to its customer; an Authority for Advance Ruling is cited supporting the IGST view.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:10:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>