<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 338 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280128</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 4-B(5) was unsustainable where the assessee had obtained a valid recognition certificate for the notified goods and the fact-finding authority recorded no mens rea or attempt to evade tax. The Tribunal&#039;s findings that refined rape seed oil was covered by the certificate and that the assessee had acted without culpable intent left no basis for punitive action. On those factual findings, interference was unwarranted and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 338 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280128</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 4-B(5) was unsustainable where the assessee had obtained a valid recognition certificate for the notified goods and the fact-finding authority recorded no mens rea or attempt to evade tax. The Tribunal&#039;s findings that refined rape seed oil was covered by the certificate and that the assessee had acted without culpable intent left no basis for punitive action. On those factual findings, interference was unwarranted and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>