https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280125 Zarda was treated as a manufactured tobacco product and not as agricultural produce under the unamended statutory definition, so the market fee demand could not be sustained for the period before 30 April 1982. The later enlarged definition was not adjudicated on merits and was left open for any future dispute. Relief was confined to the pre-amendment period, and amounts collected under the interim deposit and stay orders were to be refunded with the previously stipulated interest. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:20:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280125 Zarda was treated as a manufactured tobacco product and not as agricultural produce under the unamended statutory definition, so the market fee demand could not be sustained for the period before 30 April 1982. The later enlarged definition was not adjudicated on merits and was left open for any future dispute. Relief was confined to the pre-amendment period, and amounts collected under the interim deposit and stay orders were to be refunded with the previously stipulated interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280125