<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1243 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378799</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the Assessing Officer&#039;s attempt to reopen the assessment without new material on the deduction claim under section 10B was impermissible as it amounted to a change of opinion. The court found no error in the tribunal&#039;s decision, citing the precedent in CIT Vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd., and dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, determining that no question of law was raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:41:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1243 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378799</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the Assessing Officer&#039;s attempt to reopen the assessment without new material on the deduction claim under section 10B was impermissible as it amounted to a change of opinion. The court found no error in the tribunal&#039;s decision, citing the precedent in CIT Vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd., and dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, determining that no question of law was raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>