<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17787</link>
    <description>Questions can be referred under section 35(2A) of the Income-tax Act only if they genuinely arise out of the Tribunal&#039;s order and were considered, or could properly have been considered, on the record before it. The High Court held that question 3 was not referable because it had never cropped up for discussion in the Tribunal proceedings. Question 2 also was not referable, as the Tribunal had already found as a fact that the land and buildings were handed over to the University, while the new objection on the absence of a registered transfer deed had neither been raised before the Income-tax Officer nor considered by the Tribunal. The reference application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17787</link>
      <description>Questions can be referred under section 35(2A) of the Income-tax Act only if they genuinely arise out of the Tribunal&#039;s order and were considered, or could properly have been considered, on the record before it. The High Court held that question 3 was not referable because it had never cropped up for discussion in the Tribunal proceedings. Question 2 also was not referable, as the Tribunal had already found as a fact that the land and buildings were handed over to the University, while the new objection on the absence of a registered transfer deed had neither been raised before the Income-tax Officer nor considered by the Tribunal. The reference application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>