<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1239 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378795</link>
    <description>The court set aside both the notice of reopening of assessment and the assessment order dated 12.12.2018. It held that the Assessing Officer could not alter the basis of assessing income without new material and that the notice of reopening was issued beyond the permissible period. The court reverted to the pre-assessment order stage, emphasizing that the officer&#039;s attempt to tax the entire amount as undisclosed income was impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1239 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378795</link>
      <description>The court set aside both the notice of reopening of assessment and the assessment order dated 12.12.2018. It held that the Assessing Officer could not alter the basis of assessing income without new material and that the notice of reopening was issued beyond the permissible period. The court reverted to the pre-assessment order stage, emphasizing that the officer&#039;s attempt to tax the entire amount as undisclosed income was impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>