<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 88 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17786</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the search and seizure of gold under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, finding that the authorities had sufficient and relevant information to justify their actions. The court concluded that the conditions precedent for invoking Section 132 were met, and the subsequent material gathered post-seizure was deemed irrelevant. The petitions were dismissed, and the petitioners were ordered to pay costs to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 88 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17786</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the search and seizure of gold under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, finding that the authorities had sufficient and relevant information to justify their actions. The court concluded that the conditions precedent for invoking Section 132 were met, and the subsequent material gathered post-seizure was deemed irrelevant. The petitions were dismissed, and the petitioners were ordered to pay costs to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>