https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378790 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to a significant delay of 1625 days. Despite the appellant's explanations for the delay, including the partner being out of town, an accident, and the peon's failure to inform about the order, the Court deemed them insufficient. The Court emphasized that past behavior and filing appeals in previous years did not justify such a prolonged delay. Consequently, the Court found no legal question warranting the appeal's continuation and dismissed it. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Apr 2019 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378790 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal due to a significant delay of 1625 days. Despite the appellant's explanations for the delay, including the partner being out of town, an accident, and the peon's failure to inform about the order, the Court deemed them insufficient. The Court emphasized that past behavior and filing appeals in previous years did not justify such a prolonged delay. Consequently, the Court found no legal question warranting the appeal's continuation and dismissed it. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378790