<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1228 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378784</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s revisionary order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal. It emphasized the importance of following correct accounting standards, directing the AO to re-compute income for the succeeding year to prevent double taxation. The tribunal acknowledged the validity of the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction in correcting the method of accounting for accurate computation of taxable income, ensuring revenue neutrality without imposing double jeopardy on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1228 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378784</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s revisionary order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal. It emphasized the importance of following correct accounting standards, directing the AO to re-compute income for the succeeding year to prevent double taxation. The tribunal acknowledged the validity of the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction in correcting the method of accounting for accurate computation of taxable income, ensuring revenue neutrality without imposing double jeopardy on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>