<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1216 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378772</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the assessee during the hearing, despite proper notice being served. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents to support its decision, granting the assessee the option to file an application under section 254 of the Act if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 08:25:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1216 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378772</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the assessee during the hearing, despite proper notice being served. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents to support its decision, granting the assessee the option to file an application under section 254 of the Act if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>