https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378767 Revenue appeals were dismissed under the prevailing litigation policy because the disputed duty fell below the prescribed monetary threshold. Applying the Government's circulars on low tax effect, CESTAT Kolkata held that the appeals did not merit adjudication on merits and were therefore not maintainable for substantive consideration. The operative effect was dismissal of the appeals solely on the basis of the monetary limit under the litigation policy. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Apr 2019 08:09:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378767 Revenue appeals were dismissed under the prevailing litigation policy because the disputed duty fell below the prescribed monetary threshold. Applying the Government's circulars on low tax effect, CESTAT Kolkata held that the appeals did not merit adjudication on merits and were therefore not maintainable for substantive consideration. The operative effect was dismissal of the appeals solely on the basis of the monetary limit under the litigation policy. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378767